The Excellent Hospitality shown by Prof Sudhir Srivastava of Math Dept of Gorakhpur Uty is un forgettable. The Photos can be seen at
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bx5pCKecUdpmMDdHM1lWY0hETU0&usp=sharing
See the mails below:
.........................................
.........................................
| from: | icdgr2013 <icdgr2013@gmail.com> | ||
| to: | snp.gupta@gmail.com | ||
| date: | Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:25 AM | ||
| subject: | invitation for the conference |
Respected Dr Gupta
On behalf of the Organizing Committee and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, I feel pleasure in inviting you to participate and deliver an Invited Talk (of 30 minutes duration) on the topic related with Differential geometry/General Relativity in the conference during Nov. 09-11, 2013. Please do inform about your travel schedule at your earliest. We shall provide you local hospitality. You will stay at University Guest House, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, U.P.,
new researchers.
Looking forward to meet you in November at DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, U.P.,
With warm regards
Dr. Sudhir Kumar Srivastava,
Organising Secretary,
ICDGR-2013,
Department of Mathematics and Statistics,
DDU Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur-273009, INDIA,
Mob.-+919415303852
........................................
........................................
| from: | icdgr2013 <icdgr2013@gmail.com> | ||
| to: | Snp Gupta <snp.gupta@gmail.com> | ||
| date: | Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:26 AM | ||
| subject: | Re: invitation for the conference |
We will give ac II fare from Durg to Gorakhpur and back. Your talk will be on first day as you wish to go on 10th. Kindly confirm it we will upload the programme on web site of the tensor society on 18th of this month
Dr. Sudhir Kumar SrivastavaDr. Sudhir Kumar Srivastava,
Organising Secretary,
ICDGR-2013,
Department of Mathematics and Statistics,
DDU Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur-273009, INDIA,
Mob.-+919415303852
..............................................
..............................................
Abstract
............................................
............................................
.Dynamic Universe Model
Applications into Prediction of Blue Shifted Galaxies, VLBI applications and
other new possible avenues....
SATYAVARAPU NAGA PARAMESWARA GUPTA
( SNP.
GUPTA)a
a Affiliation : Bhilai Steel plant
Abstract
Tensors are generally tough
to understand interpret and appreciate. This is mainly because it is the number
of equations that each tensor that will be subdivided into. The overall concept
is difficult to comprehend. There is an additional headache, when tensors
subdividing into differential and integral equations. Differential equations
will not give unique solutions. Whereas Dynamic Universe Model gives a unique
solution of positions, velocities and accelerations for each point mass in the
system for every instant of time as its tensors subdivide into linear set of
equations. This new method of Dynamic Universe Model is different from earlier
mathematical methods. This can be used for solving general N-body problem. This
method solved many unsolved problems earlier like Galaxy Disk formations, Missing mass in Galaxies, Pioneer anomaly, Non-collapsing
Large scale mass structures, New horizons trajectory predictions etc. Now
attempts to solve new problems like
1.
Mathematical Prediction of Existence of Blue shifted Galaxies
2.
Explaining Very
long baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations
To support Dynamic Universe Model the we
can find the following supporting observations
3. SN1987A-
Neutrino emission
4. The
first Redshifted Quasar 3C273 is blue shifted.
Slight explanations of above concepts
1. Mathematical Prediction of
Existence of Blue shifted Galaxies announced in 2004 in Dynamic
Universe Model came true. Dynamic Universe Model simulations predicted the
existence of the large number of Blue
shifted Galaxies in 2004 itself, ie., more than about 35 ~ 40 numbers known at
the time of Astronomer Hubble in 1930s. It was confirmed by Hubble Space
Telescope (HST) observations in the year 2009. Today the known number of Blue
shifted Galaxies is more than 7000 scattered all over the sky and the number is
increasing day by day. In addition Quasars, UV Galaxies, X-ray, γ- Ray sources
and other Blue Galaxies etc., are also Blue shifted Galaxies. Out of a 930,000 Galaxy
spectra in the SDSS database, 40% are images for Galaxies; that gives to
558,000 Galaxies. There are 120,000 Quasars, 50,000 brotherhood (X-ray, γ-ray,
Blue Galaxies take out full data for full claim) of quasars, 7000 blue shifted
galaxies. That is more than 31.7% of available Galaxy count are Blue shifted.
Just to support Bigbang theory, we are neglecting such a huge amount Blue
shifted Galaxies. It appears it is a Godly Devotion to Bigbang cosmologies!
A paper
titled ‘No big bang and general relativity: Proves DUMAS (dynamic
universe model of cosmology a computer simulation)’ with CODE: DSR894 was
submitted to JOURNAL: “Physical Review D (D15)’ on 24May04.
The actual ratio of Red shifted to
Blue shifted Galaxies will depend on
1. Universal Gravitational Force
acting on each Galaxy at that instant of time,
2. The position of the observer in the
Universe
3. The actual point mass distribution
in three dimensions at that instant of time. This ratio can never be 50:50.
See
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-abs_connect?db_key=AST&db_key=PRE&qform=AST&arxiv_sel=astro-ph&arxiv_sel=cond-mat&arxiv_sel=cs&arxiv_sel=gr-qc&arxiv_sel=hep-ex&arxiv_sel=hep-lat&arxiv_sel=hep-ph&arxiv_sel=hep-th&arxiv_sel=math&arxiv_sel=math-ph&arxiv_sel=nlin&arxiv_sel=nucl-ex&arxiv_sel=nucl-th&arxiv_sel=physics&arxiv_sel=quant-ph&arxiv_sel=q-bio&sim_query=YES&ned_query=YES&adsobj_query=YES&aut_logic=OR&obj_logic=OR&author=&object=&start_mon=&start_year=&end_mon=&end_year=&ttl_logic=AND&title=blue+shifted+quasars&txt_logic=AND&text=blue+shifted+quasars&nr_to_return=200&start_nr=1&jou_pick=ALL&ref_stems=&data_and=ALL&group_and=ALL&start_entry_day=&start_entry_mon=&start_entry_year=&end_entry_day=&end_entry_mon=&end_entry_year=&min_score=&sort=SCORE&data_type=SHORT&aut_syn=YES&ttl_syn=YES&txt_syn=YES&aut_wt=1.0&obj_wt=1.0&ttl_wt=0.3&txt_wt=3.0&aut_wgt=YES&obj_wgt=YES&ttl_wgt=YES&txt_wgt=YES&ttl_sco=YES&txt_sco=YES&version=1
and
DYNAMIC UNIVERSE MODEL: Blue shifted quasars in ADS
and
DYNAMIC UNIVERSE MODEL: Blue shifted quasars in ADS
2. Explaining
Large variation in the Gravitational bending results of VLBI In this, the effect of Universal
Gravitational Force is calculated on a Radio Photon by using a singularity free
and collision free N-body problem solution called Dynamic Universe Model. Here
the capabilities of this Dynamic Universe Model are extended into micro world
i.e. to light photons and Radio wavelength photons and Neutrinos etc. By doing so a real world Very long baseline
interferometry (VLBI) observations are explained. The VLBI techniques give gravitational
bending results in a wide range of values. Now Dynamic Universe Model explains
reason for such variation. The basic difference is that where present day
Physics considers gravitation effects of only Sun or the main gravitating body
only, the Dynamic Universe Model considers Gravitational effect of Sun,
Planets, Globular clusters, Milky-way, Local systems etc., and finds the
Universal gravitational force vector at that instant of time for that
configuration of the Universe.
The present day Physics considers
gravitation effects of only the main gravitating body, whereas Dynamic Universe
Model considers the Gravitational effect of Sun, Planets, Globular clusters,
Milky-way, Local systems etc., and finds the Universal gravitational force
vector at that instant of time, for that configuration of the Universe.
Can
the gravitational effect of Universe be neglected near Sun? Tide caused by Sun and Moon in oceans-- We observe
high tide and low tide in the mornings and evenings, or on full-moon-day and
no-moon-day. These tides are caused by gravitation of Sun and Moon only. So we can
not neglect gravitation effect of Sun and Moon on Earth. For better accuracies we have to consider
planets also….
Large variation in the Gravitational bending results
of VLBI: Very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) , in the field of Radio
astronomical observations of quasars, Galaxies etc. This variation is clearly
visible when the solar gravitational bending / deflection angle is plotted
against Solar Elongation angle.
Shapiro
et al, 2004 [13]: ‘Measurement of Solar Gravitational Deflection of VLBI
data of Radio waves’. Their data set consists of
measurements, each of 24-hour session observations (‘‘experiments’’), totalling
about 2500, spanning over the years 1979–1999 ( for 87 VLBI sites and 541 radio
sources). Differences between global estimates of γ in fig 3 --- clearly indicates the variation
in the Gravitational bending angle of radio waves
Ojars J.
Sovers et al (1997) [12]: also mentioned in their results about such variation.
They gave a detailed description of different experiments, a good history and
the experiments that gave higher accuracies for angular positioning, for
point-like extragalactic radio sources at the sub-milliarcsecond (nanoradian)
level.
E.
Fomalont et al in Apr 2009 [5]: observed position changes with respect to session
and Frequency in their paper. These
due to Universal Gravitational force
3. SN1987A-
Neutrino emission
from supernova before the star bursts’ is an important discovery, when viewed
from ‘Dynamic universe model of cosmology’ point of view. In OMEG05, we have
successfully presented the reasons for calculation error called ‘missing mass’
in an inhomogeneous, anisotropic and multi-body Dynamic universe Model, where
this error is not occurring. But there are some new voices that say about
generation of some flavors of neutrinos during Bigbang. We find from SN1987A
Neutrino generation covers all flavors. Remaining flavors of Neutrinos are
generated from sun and stars. This covers the whole spectrum. This paper covers
all these aspects.
4. The first Redshifted
Quasar 3C273 is blue shifted.
The author Schmidt in 1963 published the
first paper on a quasar declaring it as red shifted [1]. He said:
“Spectra
of the star were taken with the prime-focus spectrograph at the 200-in.
telescope with dispersions of 400 and 190 Å per mm. They show a number of broad
emission features on a rather blue
continuum. The most prominent features, which have widths around 50 Å, are,
in order of strength, at 5632, 3239, 5792, 5032 Å. These and other weaker
emission bands are listed in the first column of Table 1.”
He
concluded that this quasi stellar object now well known as Quasar. It is the
nuclear region of a galaxy with a cosmological red-shift of 0.158,
corresponding to an apparent velocity of 47,400 km/sec. The distance would be
around 500 megaparsecs, and the diameter of the nuclear region would have to be
less than 1 kiloparsec.
The
first Redshifted Quasar 3C273 is Blue shifted !
The Table 1 shown below embeds the table 1 of
Dr Schmidt in the first 4 columns. The remaining columns show how the quasar is
blue shifted for the same wavelengths. I.e., the same wave lengths of his
observations were used in this paper to show this same quasar 3C273 is Blue
shifted. To support further on this, the spectrum observations made by other
three more authors were also discussed in this paper. The checking of the first
Redshifted Quasar 3C273 for a possibility of blue shift was tried mainly
because of the observation of Dr. Schmidt saying this Quasars 3C273’s spectrum
is in the “blue continuum” [1]. The Quasars are known for some of the
irregularities in the spectrum like some spectral lines match exactly with the
some elemental lines with some blue / redshift ratio while some other prominent
lines don’t match for the same ratio.
Basically
many astronomers in their published papers said that sodium line, Carbon line
CIV etc., are blue shifts other lines. There are observed variation in quasars
in the lines w.r.t other lines in the known spectrums. If the quasars are taken
as blue shifted such variation will be very very less or even cease to
exist. To explain such phenomenon Bigbang based cosmologists take the help of million
light years length of sodium with a velocity of jet at
50000000 meters / second in the case of this 3C273. How such length
of sodium can exist I don’t know.
In
the Table 1, in addition to the original values given
by Dr. M. Schmidt, four new columns were added. These columns show the possible
blue shift of ‘(-0.143122)’ of
the Quasar 3C273 and the resulting wavelengths after the blue shift. SDSS
website gives different possible wavelengths in angstrom units in their webpage on ‘Algorithms -
Emission and absorption line fitting’ [4]. These wavelengths were chosen
as they will be more authentic and accurate. Please note there are some
slight differences in the numerical values in wavelengths as given by Schmidt
and SDSS webpage.
|
Table
1. Wave-lengths and Identifications as given by Dr. M. Schmidt
|
Table
1: Observations in this paper
|
||||||
|
|
/1.158
|
0
|
|
0 from
SDSS
|
|||
|
3239
|
2797
|
2798
|
Mg II
|
3780.00
|
H_theta+19
|
3799
|
|
|
4595
|
3968
|
3970
|
Hg
|
5362.49
|
Mg+186
|
5177
|
Note
1
|
|
4753
|
4104
|
4102
|
H
|
5546.88
|
Mg+370
|
5177
|
Note
1
|
|
5032
|
4345
|
4340
|
H
|
5872.48
|
Na-23
|
5895
|
|
|
5200–5415
|
4490–4675
|
6068-6319
|
Na-OI
|
Note
2
|
|||
|
5632
|
4864
|
4861
|
H
|
6572.70
|
H_alpha+8
|
6565
|
|
|
5792
|
5002
|
5007
|
[O
III]
|
6759.42
|
SII+27
|
6732
|
|
|
6005–6190
|
5186–5345
|
7008-7223
|
blue
continuum
|
Note
3
|
|||
|
6400–6510
|
5527–5622
|
7468-7597
|
blue
continuum
|
Note
3
|
|||
Note
1: Later measurements of this QUASAR 3C273 at wavelengths 4595 and 4793
show dips or flatter curves instead of peaks (absorption
spectra instead of emission spectra).
Dr. M. Schmidt’s paper “3C 273: A Star-like Object with Large
Red-shift”, published in Nature 197, 1040 (1963)
Algorithms - Emission and absorption line fitting of SDSShttp://www.sdss.org/dr7/algorithms/speclinefits.html
