Saturday 17 October 2015

A paper "Blue shifted Galaxies in Expanding Universe" was accepted for ICGR15 Amravathi


My paper on blue shifted Galaxies was accepted in Amravati................
See below the mail and part of the paper.

==================================================

GmailSnp Gupta <snp.gupta@gmail.com>

ICGR-2015
5 messages

Vaibhav Bokey <bokey.vaibhav1@gmail.com>Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:25 PM
To: snp.gupta@gmail.com
Dear Madam, Good Day.
[1] Received ABSTRACT of your paper entitled as “BLUE.....................UNIVERSE” and it has been ACCEPTED for its presentation in ICGR-2015.
[2] Please do complete other formalities immediately.
[3] Have you paid Registration fees of ICGR-2015.
[4] Please inform accordingly to ati_ksadhav@yahoo.co.in


Dr Kishor Adhav Ph.D.; D.Sc.
Professor and Head
Department of Mathematics
Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, AMRAVATI,[MAHARASHTRA STATE] (444602)  INDIA .

(O)0091-721-2664862 , (R)0091-721-2662242 ; (Mobile)0091-9011044315

Residence: M - 10 , " Tathastu " ,Nandanwan Colony, CAMP, AMRAVATI.


Snp Gupta <snp.gupta@gmail.com>Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:57 AM
To: Vaibhav Bokey <bokey.vaibhav1@gmail.com>, Kishor Adhav <ati_ksadhav@yahoo.co.in>
Thank you for accepting my paper sirs,
It will be a great pleasure meeting you all there.

Now I am a retired person, I hope you will provide transport , and hospitality etc....
Best
=snp
=====================================\
=====================================
=====================================


Blue shifted Galaxies in Expanding Universe

SNP.Gupta
Retd AGM, Bhilai Steel Plant,
Res 1B  / Street 57 / Sector 8 / Bhilai 490008
snp.gupta@gmail.com

Abstract

Dynamic Universe model is based on hard observed facts and does NOT depend on speculation. In this paper the simulations predicted the existence of the large number of Blue shifted Galaxies, in an expanding universe, in 2004 itself. It was confirmed by by Hubble Space Teliscope (HST) observations in the year 2009. This prediction process is clearly shown the output pictures formed from this Model from old and new simulations. These pictures depict the three dimensional orbit formations. An orbit formation means some Galaxies are coming near (Blue shifted) and some are going away (Red shifted). This paper goes on two main lines. First is the main line of thinking, to show mathematically that there will be lots and lots of blue shifted Galaxies mathematically. To support this concept the question what are the possible blue shifted Galaxies is answered further. We find that quasars are blue shifted galaxies. The second line of thinking goes with this finding, that the Quasars are blue shifted galaxies. Forrest Noble (Pan Theory) in his foreword said “over 7,000 blue shifted galaxies have been discovered extending beyond the Local Group, first predicted by Mr.Gupta. Now you can find 35% of total Galaxies are blue shifted

1. Introduction:

These simulations predicted the existence of the large number of Blueshifted Galaxies in 2004, ie., more than about 35 ~ 40 Blueshifted Galaxies known at the time of Astronomer Edwin Hubble in 1930s. The far greater numbers of Blueshifted galaxies was confirmed by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations in the year 2009. Today the known number of Blue shifted Galaxies is more than 7000 scattered all over the sky and the number is increasing day by day. In addition Quasars, UV Galaxies, X-ray, γ- Ray sources and other Blue Galaxies etc., are also Blue shifted Galaxies. Out of a 930,000 Galaxy spectra in the SDSS database, 40% are images for Galaxies; that gives to 558,000 Galaxies. There are 120,000 Quasars, 50,000 brotherhood(X-ray, γ-ray, Blue Galaxies etc.,) of quasars, 7000 blue shifted galaxies. That is more than 31.7% of available Galaxy count are Blue shifted. Just to support Bigbang theory, we are neglecting such a huge amount Blue shifted Galaxies. It appears to be a Godly Devotion to Bigbang cosmologies! This was published as the fourth book in the series on Dynamic Universe Model: SITA.

In the original paper in 2004[1], there are simulations of the Universe. Here in these simulations the universe is assumed to be heterogeneous and anisotropic. This prediction process was clearly shown in the output data and pictures formed from this Model.   These pictures show from the random starting points to final stabilized orbits of the point masses involved.   Because of this dynamism built in the model, the universe does not collapse into a lump (due to Newtonian gravitational static forces). This Model depicts the three dimensional orbit formations of involved masses or celestial bodies like in our present universe. From the resulting graphs one can see the orbit formations of the point masses, which were positioned randomly at the start. An orbit formation means that some Galaxies are coming near (Blue shifted) and some are going away (Red shifted) relative to an observer’s viewpoint.

New simulations were conducted about a month before these writings. The resulting data graphs of these simulations with different kinds of input data are shown in this paper in the later parts.
In all these simulations, all point masses will have different distances, masses.
- Simulation 1: All point masses are Galaxies
- Simulation 2: All point masses are Globular Clusters
- Simulation 3: Globular Clusters 34 Galaxies 33 aggregates 33 conglomerations 33
- Simulation 4: Small star systems 10 Globular Clusters 100 Galaxies 8 aggregates 8 conglomerations 7
The problem with such simulations is the overwhelmingly large amounts of data. Each simulation gives 3 dimensional vector data of accelerations, velocities, positions for every point mass in every iteration in addition to many types of derived data. A minimum of 133 x 18 data of 16 decimal digits for each iteration.  It is data and data everywhere. It is a huge data mine indeed. 
One has to use graphs for visualizing such vast amounts of data. Again the question comes, which data to choose for showing in the graphs? Is it starting? Running? End of iteration? All bodies?Some groups? Single body? Selected bodies? Positions? Velocities? Accelerations? JPEG?GIF? Normal scales? Logarithmic Scales? Thirteen new graphs are being prepared for every iteration for positions.
From all the graphs, I usually handpick some graphs for showing the results.
I don’t know what data to be included as additional files, so I did not include any. I could be directly contacted for any of the data files, should anyone require them.
Hence we may conclude:

The actual ratio of Red shifted to Blue shifted Galaxies will depend on
1. Universal Gravitational Force acting on each Galaxy at that instant of time,
2. The position of the observer in the Universe
3. The actual point mass distribution in the universe in three dimensions at that instant of time. This ratio can never be 50:50.

Newtonian two-body problem used differential equations. Einstein’s general relativity used tensors, which in turn unwrap into differential equations. Dynamic Universe Model uses tensors that give simple equations with interdependencies. Differential equations will not give unique solutions. Whereas Dynamic Universe Model gives a unique solution of positions, velocities and accelerations; for each point mass in the system for every instant of time. This new method of Mathematics in Dynamic Universe Model is different from all earlier methods of solving general N-body problem.
This universe exists now in the present state, it existed earlier, and it will continue to exist in future also in a similar way. All physical laws will work at any time and at any place. Evidences for the three dimensional rotations or the dynamism of the universe can be seen in the streaming motions of local group and local cluster. Here in this dynamic universe, both the red shifted and blue shifted Galaxies co-exist simultaneously.

A point to be noted here is that the Dynamic Universe Model never reduces to General relativity on any condition. It uses a different type of mathematics based on Newtonian physics. This mathematics used here is simple and straightforward. As there are no differential equations present in Dynamic Universe Model, the set of equations give single solution in x y z Cartesian coordinates for every point mass for every time step. All the mathematics and the Excel based software details are explained in the three books published by the author[14, 15, 16] In the first book, the solution to N-body problem-called Dynamic Universe Model (SITA) is presented; which is singularity-free, inter-body collision free and dynamically stable. This is the Basic Theory of Dynamic Universe Model published in 2010 [14]. The second book in the series describes the SITA software in EXCEL emphasizing the singularity free portions. It explains more than 21,000 different equations (2011)[15]. The third book describes the SITA software in EXCEL in the accompanying CD / DVD emphasizing mainly HANDS ON usage of a simplified version in an easy way. The third book contains explanation for 3000 equations instead of earlier 21000 (2011)[16].

SITA solution can be used in many places like presently unsolved applications like Pioneer anomaly at the Solar system level, Missing mass due to Star circular velocities and Galaxy disk formation at Galaxy level etc. Here we are using it for prediction of blue shifted Galaxies.

Dynamic Universe model does NOT depend on speculation. It is based on hard observed facts. I am writing these sentences especially as cosmology is becoming more and more speculative today.

Monday 21 September 2015

Photos with Stephen Hawking and Roger Penrose in 2004


Some News paper Cuttings













Journal of Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology accepted a paper on ..... ' Uniformity of CMB in our Dynamic Universe '

GmailSnp Gupta <snp.gupta@gmail.com>

Your Submission
1 message

OMICS Group - Engineering Journals <em@editorialmanager.com>Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:28 AM
Reply-To: OMICS Group - Engineering Journals <engineeringjournals@omicsonline.com>
To: Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta <snp.gupta@gmail.com>
Ref.: Ms. No. Engineering Journals-15-940
Uniformity of CMB in our Dynamic Universe
Engineering Journals

Dear Dr. Parameswara Gupta,

I am pleased to tell you that your work has now been accepted for publication in Engineering Journals.

It was accepted on Sep 21, 2015

Comments from the Editor and Reviewers can be found below.

Thank you for submitting your work to this journal.

With kind regards

Mahaboobi Shaik
Managing Editor
Engineering Journals

Comments from the Editors and Reviewers:

Reviewer #1: Very important analysis of the cosmic microwave radiation. Must be published.

Sunday 6 September 2015

My son Krishna's First Blogs on HANA

Performing a full system copy can be a time-consuming process for system administrators. They spend a considerable amount of time and effort preparing the software environment and going through complicated procedures to ensure that the backup process is carried out with minimum disruption to the business and in accordance with best practices.
This white paper describes the speed and efficiency of performing a homogeneous system copy of an SAP® ERP system using Pure Storage® FlashArray//m50 and Pure Storage FlashReduce with:
- See more at: http://www.purestorage.com/blog/sap-homogenous-system-copy-on-pure-storage-flash-array-with-sap-erp-and-oracle/#sthash.MNmYU0OI.dpuf
Performing a full system copy can be a time-consuming process for system administrators. They spend a considerable amount of time and effort preparing the software environment and going through complicated procedures to ensure that the backup process is carried out with minimum disruption to the business and in accordance with best practices.
This white paper describes the speed and efficiency of performing a homogeneous system copy of an SAP® ERP system using Pure Storage® FlashArray//m50 and Pure Storage FlashReduce with:
- See more at: http://www.purestorage.com/blog/sap-homogenous-system-copy-on-pure-storage-flash-array-with-sap-erp-and-oracle/#sthash.MNmYU0OI.dpuf
Performing a full system copy can be a time-consuming process for system administrators. They spend a considerable amount of time and effort preparing the software environment and going through complicated procedures to ensure that the backup process is carried out with minimum disruption to the business and in accordance with best practices.
This white paper describes the speed and efficiency of performing a homogeneous system copy of an SAP® ERP system using Pure Storage® FlashArray//m50 and Pure Storage FlashReduce with:
- See more at: http://www.purestorage.com/blog/sap-homogenous-system-copy-on-pure-storage-flash-array-with-sap-erp-and-oracle/#sthash.MNmYU0OI.dpuf


Performing a full system copy can be a time-consuming process for system administrators. They spend a considerable amount of time and effort preparing the software environment and going through complicated procedures to ensure that the backup process is carried out with minimum disruption to the business and in accordance with best practices.
This white paper describes the speed and efficiency of performing a homogeneous system copy of an SAP® ERP system using Pure Storage® FlashArray//m50 and Pure Storage FlashReduce 

These are my son's First blogs and white papers. Please see :)


http://www.purestorage.com/blog/sap-homogenous-system-copy-on-pure-storage-flash-array-with-sap-erp-and-oracle/

Wednesday 2 September 2015

Applied Physics Research Canada, Published a paper on ....Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Live Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going To Pluto...

Applied Physics Research; Vol. 7, No. 4; 2015
ISSN 1916-9639 E-ISSN 1916-9647
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education 63
Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Live Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going To Pluto
S. N. P. Gupta1
1 Retd AGM ( C&IT) Bhilai steel Plant, Bhilai, 490001, CG, India
Correspondence: S. N. P. Gupta, Retd AGM (C&IT) Bhilai steel Plant, Retd AGM (C&IT) Bhilai steel Plant,
Bhilai, 490001, CG, India. Tel: 91-964-409-6888 / 788-222-4670. E-mail: snp.gupta@gmail.com
Received: March 16, 2014 Accepted: May 27, 2015 Online Published: July 31, 2015
doi:10.5539/apr.v7n4p63 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/apr.v7n4p63


Abstract
In this paper, Dynamic Universe Model is used for prediction of trajectory of New Horizons (NH) satellite from 3rd Jan 2009 to 1st Jan 2017, taking trajectory ephemerides data of Jan 1&2, 2009 from NASA’s official web of NH, as basis. The NH web gives data up to 1st Sept 2015 as on 20 Jul 2014. The present calculated data from Dynamic Universe Model is given up to 1st Jan 2017, which is 16 months more than the available data. And further trajectory data also can be calculated. It may please be noted the error percentage in predictions went to a maximum in error percentages (0.24 %, -0.0009 %, -0.05 %) compared with NH web for the same date in XYZ coordinates, where as error percentages started from -0.002%, 0.00016 %, -0.0003 % for XYZ coordinates respectively.

Keywords: dynamic universe model, New Horizons (NH) satellite, Pluto Mission, Satellite Trajectory calculations, Pioneer Anomaly
1. Introduction
1.1 Using Dynamic Universe Model for New Horizons Trajectory:
Dynamic universe model can explain Pioneer anomaly, i.e., the higher gravitational attraction forces experienced towards SUN after Jupiter, in a similar way it can also explain NH trajectory anomalies and predict for few more years than the present predictions. New Horizons (NH) is NASA’s artificial satellite now going towards to the dwarf planet Pluto. It is the first spacecraft to go near and study Pluto and its moons, Charon, Nix, and Hydra. NH is expected to go near to Pluto in 2015. Later NH will be used for studying Kuiper Belt. The behavior of NH is similar to Pioneer Space craft as
NH traveling in a similar manner.

Journal of Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology USA accepted a paper .... Explaining formation of Astronomical Jets using Dynamic Universe Model....on Aug 06,

Journal of Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology published a paper....'.Explaining formation of Astronomical Jets using Dynamic Universe Model, 2015  Aug 06...

Explaining formation of Astronomical Jets using Dynamic Universe Model
Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta* 

Accepted on Aug 06, 2015

Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology ISSN: 2329-6542
Gupta, J Astrophys Aerospace Technol 2015, 3:1
Abstract 
Astronomical jets are observed from the centres of many Galaxies including our own Milkyway. The formation of such jet is explained using SITA simulations of Dynamic Universe Model. For this purpose the path traced by a test neutron is calculated and depicted using a set up of one densemass of the mass equivalent to mass of Galaxy center, 90 stars with similar masses of stars near Galaxy center, mass equivalents of 23 Globular Cluster groups, 16 Milkyway parts, Andromeda and Triangulum Galaxies at appropriate distances. Five different kinds of theoretical simulations gave positive results
The path travelled by this test neutron was found to be an astronomical jet emerging from Galaxy center.

Journal of Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology USA published a paper on ....'.No Dark Matter’ Prediction from Dynamic Universe Model Came True!....on July 05, 2015'

No Dark Matter’ Prediction from Dynamic Universe Model Came True!
Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta*

Published on July 05, 2015
Volume 3 • Issue 1 • 1000117

Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology ISSN: 2329-6542
Gupta, J Astrophys Aerospace Technol 2015, 3:1
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2329-6542.1000117


Abstract
This paper discusses about the theoretical “non-requirement” of dark matter, or in other words, there is no missing mass in galaxies. A singularity free and collision free n-body problem solution called dynamic universe model was used to find out the theoretical star circular velocity curves in a galaxy. Here five cases are presented. In the first case a HUGE mass at the center of galaxy, sun like stars and external galaxies are assumed, when plotted, the graph of last iteration shows disk formation and velocities achieved. This circular velocities verses radius graph looks exactly similar to observations by astronomers. In all the other cases, either the central mass is missing or external galaxies are missing or both are missing where resulting graphs look different. It can be inferred that the theoretical requirement of dark matter is calculation error, that no dark matter (missing mass) is required according to dynamic universe model. This prediction was first presented in Tokyo University in 2005. Later the findings from LUX in 2013 the (Large Underground Xenon) experiment confirmed this prediction. This new Tensor math in dynamic universe model was used for solving a large variety of physical problems which are otherwise not possible with present day physics. This method solved many unsolved problems earlier like existence of blue shifted galaxies galaxy disk formations, missing mass in galaxies, pioneer anomaly, non-collapsing large scale mass structures and new horizons trajectory predictions etc.
AMS subject classifications: 70F10 (n-body problems), 70F15 (celestial mechanics), 70E55 (dynamics of multi
body systems) 70-05 (experimental work) 70-08 (computational methods).
Keywords: Dark matter; Tensors; Quasars; stars; Rotation curves;
Missing mass in galaxies; Galaxy structure; Galaxy; Kinematics and
dynamics; Cosmology; Observations
Introduction
Rotation curve of galaxy: Missing mass/dark matter concept
Observationally a galaxy also looks like a star, but on the high
telescope resolution, the constituent stars are visible, the more stars,
therefore the more massive the galaxy. By the early 1960's, there were
indications coming for doubting about the missing mass. The first
indication that there is a significant fraction of missing matter in a
galaxy is from the studies our own milky way. The quantum of mass
inside sun’s orbit around the milky way center is observationally less
than the calculated one. A straight forward rotation curves from the
rotating wheel can be seen in Figure 1, which is true according to
Kepler’s third law also as planet-like or differential rotation. Notice that
the orbital speeds falls off as you go to greater radii within the galaxy.
This is called a Keplerian rotation curve as shown in second part of
Figure 1.

'No Dark Matter' prediction from Dynamic Universe Model came true!....Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology ISSN: 2329-6542 Journal of Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology Gupta, J Astrophys Aerospace Technol 2015, 3:1 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2329-6542.1000117 Keywords: Dark matter; Tensors; Quasars; stars; Rotation curves; Missing mass in galaxies; Galaxy structure; Galaxy; Kinematics and dynamics; Cosmology; Observations Introduction Rotation curve of galaxy: Missing mass/dark matter concept Observationally a galaxy also looks like a star, but on the high telescope resolution, the constituent stars are visible, the more stars, therefore the more massive the galaxy. By the early 1960's, there were indications coming for doubting about the missing mass. The first indication that there is a significant fraction of missing matter in a galaxy is from the studies our own milky way. The quantum of mass inside sun’s orbit around the milky way center is observationally less than the calculated one. A straight forward rotation curves from the rotating wheel can be seen in Figure 1, which is true according to Kepler’s third law also as planet-like or differential rotation. Notice that the orbital speeds falls off as you go to greater radii within the galaxy. This is called a Keplerian rotation curve as shown in second part of Figure 1.

Astrophysics & Aerospace
Technology ISSN: 2329-6542
Journal of Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology
Gupta, J Astrophys Aerospace Technol 2015, 3:1
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2329-6542.1000117
Keywords: Dark matter; Tensors; Quasars; stars; Rotation curves;
Missing mass in galaxies; Galaxy structure; Galaxy; Kinematics and
dynamics; Cosmology; Observations
Introduction
Rotation curve of galaxy: Missing mass/dark matter concept
Observationally a galaxy also looks like a star, but on the high
telescope resolution, the constituent stars are visible, the more stars,
therefore the more massive the galaxy. By the early 1960's, there were
indications coming for doubting about the missing mass. The first
indication that there is a significant fraction of missing matter in a
galaxy is from the studies our own milky way. The quantum of mass
inside sun’s orbit around the milky way center is observationally less
than the calculated one. A straight forward rotation curves from the
rotating wheel can be seen in Figure 1, which is true according to
Kepler’s third law also as planet-like or differential rotation. Notice that
the orbital speeds falls off as you go to greater radii within the galaxy.
This is called a Keplerian rotation curve as shown in second part of
Figure 1.

Monday 20 July 2015

Journal of Tensor society published a paper in Special Vol. 8 (2014), pp.77-92 on Dynamic Universe Model Applications





J. T. S. ISSN : 0974-5428
Special Vol. 8 (2014), pp.77-92
Dynamic Universe Model Applications into Prediction of Blue
Shifted Galaxies, VLBI Applications and other New Possible
Avenues....
SATYAVARAPU NAGA PARAMESWARA GUPTA
Bhilai Steel plant
snp.gupta@gmail.com
(Received: November 11, 2013)
Abstract
Tensors are generally tough to understand interpret and appreciate. This
is mainly because it is the number of equations that each tensor that will be
subdivided into. The overall concept is difficult to comprehend. There is an ad-
ditional headache, when tensors subdividing into differential and integral equa-
tions. Differential equations will not give unique solutions. Whereas Dynamic
Universe Model gives a unique solution of positions, velocities and accelerations
for each point mass in the system for every instant of time as its tensors subdi-
vide into linear set of equations. This new method of Dynamic Universe Model
is different from earlier mathematical methods. This can be used for solving
general N-body problem. This method solved many unsolved problems earlier
like Galaxy Disk formations, Missing mass in Galaxies, Pioneer anomaly, Non-
collapsing Large scale mass structures, New horizons trajectory predictions etc.
Now attempts to solve new problems like
1. Mathematical Prediction of Existence of Blue shifted Galaxies
2. Explaining Very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations
To support Dynamic Universe Model the we can nd the following supporting
observations
3. SN1987A- Neutrino emission (Supporting Existence of Blue Shifted Galax-
ies)
4. The Fi rst Redshifted Quasar 3C273 is blue shifted. (Supporting Exis-
tence of Blue Shifted Galaxies)
5. The most distant Quasar eso1122 found to have a Blue Shift of 0.110473
(Supporting Existence of Blue Shifted Galaxies)


1. IntroductionTensors are generally tough to understand interpret and appreciate. This
is mainly because it is the number of equations that each tensor that will be
subdivided into. The overall concept is difficult to comprehend. There is an
additional headache tensors subdividing into differential and integral equations.
We all know, Newtonian two body problem used differential equations.
Einstein's general relativity used tensors which in turn unwrap into differential
equations. Dynamic Universe Model uses tensors that will give simple equations
with interdependencies. Differential equations will not give unique solutions.
Whereas Dynamic Universe Model gives a unique solution of positions, velocities
and accelerations for each point mass in the system for every instant of time.
This new method of Dynamic Universe Model is different from earlier method of
solving general N-body problem. This method solves many unsolved problems
like
1. Galaxy Disk formation using Dynamic Universe Model (Densemass)
Equations
2. Solution to Missing mass in Galaxies: It proves that there is no missing
mass in Galaxy due to circular velocity curves
3. Explains gravity disturbances like Pioneer anomaly, etc
4. Non-collapsing Large scale mass structures formed when non-uniform
density distributions of masses were used
5. Offers Singularity free solutions.
6. Non- collapsing Galaxy structures
7. Solving Dark matter or Missing mass in Galaxies, and it nds reason
for Galaxy circular velocity curves. See 'The LUX: Large Underground
Xenon experiment and the detector attached to the International Space
Station DID NOT detect any `Dark matter' till the end of OCT 2013
after a year of searching [6, 8, 9, 10, 11].
8. Blue shifted and red shifted Galaxies co-existence
9. Explains the force behind expansion of universe.
10. Explains the large voids and non-uniform matter densities.
11. Predicts the trajectory of New Horizons satellite.
12. Withstands 105 times the Normal Jeans swindle test
13. Explaining the Existence of large number of blue shifted Galaxies etc.

.....................................................................
.....................................................................

GmailSnp Gupta <snp.gupta@gmail.com>

publication of article
1 message

tensor society <thetensorsociety@gmail.com>Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:13 PM

To: snp.gupta@gmail.com

Dear Dr SNP Gupta
 Sorry for the delay. Your paper published in the The Journal of The The Tensor Society Vol.8 is attached with this mail. It is requested to kindly pay the processing charges as under:
Processing charges of Printing:Rs.4000.00
Annual membershipRs.300
total:Rs.4300.00
You can deposit the money in any punjab national bank branch in account of "The tensor Society" PNB Talkatora Road, Lucknow Account No.-2424000100680717 or DD in favour of The Tensor Society Payable at Lucknow. Please inform earliest possible and oblige.

--

Dr. Sudhir Kumar Srivastava,
Secretary, The Tensor Society,
Department of Mathematics and Statistics,
DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur,
U.P.,INDIA-273009,
Mob- +91-9415303852


snpgupta.pdf
96K

Tuesday 7 July 2015

Participating in Viva-voce for Doctoral students of Astrophysics



Yesterday I was invited for participating a viva-voce conducted for PhD student of Astrophysics fraternity at Mathematics dept of Pt Ravi Shankar University, Raipur. Subject is General Relativity. This department is headed by Prof Pathak. I was invited by Prof. Goswami.
Of course the student could not answer my questions when directed towards me. The irony is I am not a PhD or not even a Mathematics degree holder.  Thanks to Prof Goswami for inviting me.